Saudi Arabia · Riyadh · Jeddah · Eastern Province · NEOMProject enquiries · Secure request form
Documented case study · KAUST · Thuwal, Jeddah Region

KAUST Thuwal: GPR Survey & Borehole Utility Clearance Near Jeddah

A documented pre-drilling subsurface investigation using 35 GPR profiles and electromagnetic utility detection to support the selection of three proposed borehole positions at KAUST, Thuwal.

LocationThuwal · Jeddah Region
Survey methodGPR + EML/RD
PurposeBorehole utility risk assessment
SourceFinal technical report · 03 Nov 2026
GPR survey team using a MALA radar system on sandy ground at KAUST, Thuwal
Real field photograph from final report, page 22

A practical case study of non-destructive scanning before geotechnical borehole drilling, based on the final report dated 3 November 2026.

352D GPR profiles
3proposed borehole locations
3 × 3 mscan grid per candidate position
80–950 MHzMALÅ antenna frequency range

Project background: reducing drilling risk at KAUST

The King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) site is in Thuwal, north of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The recorded scope was to use Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) to investigate buried services and support the selection of three proposed geotechnical borehole positions on predominantly sandy ground.

Before intrusive drilling, possible utilities and unexpected subsurface targets must be identified and documented. This assignment combined radar survey lines, GPS survey control, and electromagnetic utility locating to inform which borehole positions should be reconsidered and which locations could be proposed for further verification.

Survey scope and equipment

The final report records 35 GPR profiles, each listed as 3 m in its profile schedule. The survey assessed local 3 m × 3 m grids around each of the three candidate borehole positions, rather than claiming uninterrupted coverage of the wider campus.

  • GPR system: MALÅ Easy Locator Pro Wide Range HDR with 80–950 MHz antenna range.
  • Survey control: GPS benchmark for the positioning and referencing of the survey work.
  • EML / Radio Detection: utility tracing of detectable conductive services before the GPR investigation.
  • Data processing: interpretation of 2D radar sections using MalaVision processing.
  • Drawing output: an AutoCAD plan showing three proposed borehole locations.

Field workflow and interpretation

  1. Establish site reference control and position the candidate borehole areas.
  2. Conduct electromagnetic locating and trace identifiable conductive utilities.
  3. Acquire continuous GPR profiles on the local survey grids.
  4. Review 2D radar reflections and flag repeatable, anomalous hyperbolic responses.
  5. Reject or adjust candidate areas containing interpreted utility indications, and prepare the final proposed locations on the CAD drawing.

Findings and engineering outcome

Interpretation identified several anomalous radar responses considered possible underground utilities and services. The report states that areas containing such responses were avoided and new locations were proposed. The deliverable comprised three proposed borehole positions presented on the drawing in Appendix B.

Engineering interpretation: “Proposed” does not mean certified utility-free or permission to drill. Possible underground services require review against available records, field markings, relevant permits and controlled verification where necessary.

Ground conditions and detection limitations

Ground-penetrating radar response varies with the conductivity and moisture content of the ground, antenna frequency, surface structures, reinforcement, and target geometry. The final report specifically highlights interference from conductive soil, above-ground materials and metallic objects. No universally achievable detection depth or absolute clearance is claimed here.

Explore our GPR survey services, underground utility detection and Jeddah-region survey coverage.

Fieldwork photographs and GPR data from the report

Actual report photographs illustrate the radar survey, survey control and electromagnetic utility tracing undertaken for this assignment. The radargram images are extracts from the technical report.

CAD-based plan of the proposed borehole zones

Public presentation extract of the three scanned zones from the AutoCAD drawing reproduced in Appendix B of the report. Exact site coordinates are omitted from this website preview; the official drawing is the controlled engineering record.

Extract of KAUST CAD drawing showing three scanned borehole investigation zones
CAD plan excerpt · source: report Appendix B · exact coordinates withheld

The marked GPR investigation areas support planning and review; the drawing does not replace site clearance, permits or controlled exposure of suspected utilities.

Questions about the KAUST pre-borehole GPR study

Why was GPR used before drilling at KAUST?

To identify interpreted underground utilities and anomalous responses around three candidate borehole areas, so the proposed points could be reviewed and adjusted before intrusive investigation.

How many GPR profiles were collected?

The final report documents 35 GPR profiles, each listed as approximately 3 m long, and three candidate borehole investigation zones.

Were the proposed locations guaranteed free of utilities?

No. GPR and electromagnetic locating reduce uncertainty but cannot guarantee that every utility is detected. Final drilling clearance still requires site verification and approved permits.

See another Jeddah case study: Jeddah chemical laboratory GPR investigation.

Technical source: Zahra Geosciences, final GPR report GPR-RPT-10034-2026 (3 November 2026), for the KAUST Thuwal survey. The CAD preview is adapted from Appendix B. This public case study summarises documented findings and does not reproduce the full client deliverables.

Plan before you excavate

Need subsurface information for a project?

Send the site location, survey area or route length, target depth and available drawings through the project request form.